3DSig 2024: Conformational Diversity
Date: 8 October 2024 @ 17:00
This webinar is part of a series run by the ELIXIR 3D-BioInfo Community. There is a complete list of webinars here.
Hosts
Dr. Gonzalo Parra
Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Dr Neeladri Sen
University College London (UCL)
Programme
Predicting protein conformational motions using energetic frustration analysis and AlphaFold2
Xingyue Guan (Department of Physics, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China,
Proteins perform their biological functions through motion. Although high throughput prediction of the three-dimensional static structures of proteins has proved feasible using deep-learning-based methods, predicting the conformational motions remains a challenge. Purely data-driven machine learning methods encounter difficulty for addressing such motions because available laboratory data on conformational motions are still limited. In this work, we develop a method for generating protein allosteric motions by integrating physical energy landscape information into deep-learning-based methods. We show that local energetic frustration, which represents a quantification of the local features of the energy landscape governing protein allosteric dynamics, can be utilized to empower
AlphaFold2 (AF2) to predict protein conformational motions. Starting from ground state static structures, this integrative method generates alternative structures as well as pathways of protein conformational motions, using a progressive enhancement of the energetic frustration features in the input multiple sequence alignment sequences. For a model protein adenylate kinase, we show that the generated conformational motions are consistent with available experimental and molecular dynamics simulation data. Applying the method to another two proteins KaiB and ribose-binding protein, which involve large-amplitude conformational changes, can also successfully generate the alternative conformations. We also show how to extract overall features of the AF2 energy landscape topography, which has been considered by many to be black box. Incorporating physical knowledge into deep learning-based structure prediction algorithms provides a useful strategy to address the challenges of dynamic structure prediction of allosteric proteins.
Predicting protein fold switching with AlphaFold and other approaches
Dr. Lauren Porter(National Institute of Health, USA)
Recent work suggests that AlphaFold (AF)–a deep learning-based model that can accurately infer protein structure from sequence–may discern important features of folded protein energy landscapes, defined by the diversity and frequency of different conformations in the folded state. Here, we test the limits of its predictive power on fold-switching proteins, which assume two structures with regions of distinct secondary and/or tertiary structure.
We find that (1) AF is a weak predictor of fold switching and (2) some of its successes result from memorization of training-set structures rather than learned protein energetics. Combining >280,000 models from several implementations of AF2 and AF3, a 35% success rate was achieved for fold switchers likely in AF’s training sets. AF2’s confidence metrics selected against models consistent with experimentally determined fold-switching structures and failed to discriminate between low and high energy conformations.
Further, AF captured only one out of seven experimentally confirmed fold switchers outside of its training sets despite extensive sampling of an additional ~280,000 models. Several lines of evidence suggest that AF2 has memorized structural information during training, and AF3 misassigns coevolutionary restraints. These limitations constrain the scope of successful predictions and suggest approaches to improve predictive robustness in the future.
You can find previous webinars from the 3D-BioInfo Community on the Community webinars page.
Activity log